Saturday, 3 July 2021

Letter from young Israeli Resister


View this email in your browser
My name is Eran, I’m 19 years old and I live in Tel Aviv. I refuse to be conscripted to the Israeli military becuase I am not willing to take part in the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories. I already served 14 days in military jail and last Sunday I was sentenced to another 20 days in jail.
Write Eran a letter of support
From a very early age, I strove to understand the political situation in Israel and the power relations between Israelis and Palestinians. After researching the topic I came to understand the daily reality of Palestinians living under the Israeli occupation. The more I learned about the blockade of Gaza and the lack of basic human rights for Palestinians in the West Bank the more clear it was to me that I cannot agree to become a soldier and take part in the oppression of the Palestinian people. 
In my statement to the army’s Committee for Granting Exemptions for Reasons of Conscience, I declared my reasons for my refusal of military service: 
I refuse because I believe it is immoral and unreasonable to hold the Palestinian people under military control and blockade without granting them civil and political rights, and while violating their human rights on an ongoing basis.

I refuse because I believe that all human beings should be governed by institutions that represent them. 

I refuse because I believe that enlisting in the army legitimizes the occupation and serves it.

I refuse because I believe that Israel could and should end the occupation immediately whether by agreement, withdrawal, or by granting citizenship to the Palestinian people and the establishment of a bi-national state for both Palestinians and Israelis.

I refuse because I respect the rules and norms of international law and the international community, which reject the Israeli occupation.

Write Eran a letter of support
On the day of my conscription I refused to be drafted and was sent to be tried in a military court. One of the officers there told me he wanted to stop me from going to jail and that he had a solution that would allow me to serve by joining the Israeli police force, for my service. I agreed, believing that in that way I could serve the country without taking a part in the occupation. 

I was invited to an interview for the police forces in the national headquarters in Sheikh Jarrah, in Occupied East Jerusalem. I refused because I am not willing to invade Palestinian territories. As a result, I was rejected by the police for being a conscientious objector and was sent back to the military court. The officer who suggested I join the police was angered by my “stubbornness” but  said he would try to change the police decision. I was called to another interview in West Jerusalem. There, I was rejected for stating that I would not report or use information regarding the Occupied Territories that I would receive during my police service. I was tried once again in military court, and was sentenced to jail for 14 days. 

After the military’s failed attempts to find a service position for me that would not be against my conscience, my conclusion is that it is not possible to serve in the military or the police without taking part in the occupation. After 54 years the occupation has seeped into all security positions in Israel. It is unavoidable and will only stop once the occupation itself comes to an end.

In solidarity,

Eran 
Write Eran a letter of support
Donate to help the Refusers
Facebook
Website
Instagram

If someone forwarded you this email, sign up here to receive these updates regularly

Mesarvot is an Israeli network supporting those who refuse to be soldiers of the Israeli Occupation. Refuser Solidarity Network is an international network supporting the refusers. Together, the two networks send these regular refusers updates - You can directly contact us at info@refuser.org / Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list


Copyright © 2020 Refuser Solidarity Network,Inc. 244 Fifth Avenue, Suite F39, New York City, NY, 10001.
 

Photo Credit: Ido Ramon

 

Thursday, 28 January 2021

Letter to President Joe Biden handed in at US Embassy Belfast


Over 230 organizations from 17 countries signed up for a call to action against the war in Yemen this week.  Among them were the Peace People who handed in a letter to President Joe Biden at the US Embassy in Belfast on 26 January last. The letter from Mairead Maguire asked for freedom for Julian Assange and to save the children of Yemen by ending the US/UK support for the Saudi led war there, to stop arms sales to Saudi Arabia and make peace.

In a separate development, the Wall Street Journal on 27 January reported that President Biden has suspended arms sales to Saudi Arabia temporarily. 

Below is the letter handed in to the Embassy by Mairead, Ann Patterson and other Peace People:

"Dear Mr President

Please accept my congratulations and best wishes in your work as President.

I have two urgent requests to ask of you.

l)  Free Julian Assange.

Please do all you can to free Julian Assange and release him to let him go home to his family.

He has served long enough and his family long for his presence and his punishment to be ended.

2) Save the Children of Yemen.

Your Foreign Policy is causing death and starvation of thousands of Yemeni children as the ports are blocked and people cannot get food.  Do not let history record again that powerful Governments played politics with little children’s lives. I implore you Mr. President to stop immediately  with the UK Government the war on Yemen.  Please end the arms sales to Saudi Arabia and make peace.

Sadly more and more Yemeni children are being starved by warring parties whose blockades and bomb attacks have decimated and continue to decimate their country.

Please learn from Northern Ireland, and solve this horror of war on Yemen, through dialogue.

Peace and Love

Mairead Maguire

Nobel Peace Laureate"

 

http://www.peacepeople.com/a-letter-from-nobel-laureate-mairead-maguire-to-president-biden-free-julian-assange-end-the-war-on-yemen/




 

Monday, 4 January 2021

Great News about Julian Assange

Julian will NOT BE EXTRADITED to the USA, a judge has ruled. 

 

https://www.thejournal.ie/assange-2-5315374-Jan2021/ 


Judge Vanessa Baraitser decided today that Julian Assange will not be extradited to the USA to face charges there.

The judge made her decision on health grounds.  Because of Julian's mental state it would be oppressive to extradite him, she said.

Supporters outside the court as seen on Sky News appeared to be wild with excitement.

His legal team are to apply for bail this afternoon while the prosecution are expected to appeal the decision.

Sunday, 13 December 2020

Carmen Trotta Goes to Prison tomorrow

Carmen Trotta (58) will not spend this Christmas looking after the needs of the poor in St Joseph's Catholic Worker House in Ithaca New York where he lives and works. On 12 December 2020 he will be brought to prison in FCI Ottsville, NY to start a 14 month sentence in the middle of a raging pandemic. Carmen is well known to Irish anti-war activists as he directed the public marches of supporters from O’Connell St to the Four Courts in Dublin during the 3 trials of the five Pitstop Ploughshares in 2005 and 2006.

In the early morning of 4 April 2018, with 6 other protestors (the Kings Bay 7) he entered Kings Bay nuclear submarine base in Georgia  to “beat swords into plowshares”. All seven were sentenced in the course of the past year. In Ireland, the Pitstop Ploughshares successfully defended their own similar actions at Shannon airport on the plea of lawful excuse and were acquitted by a jury; the Kings Bay Seven Plowshares were denied the same defence in the USA.

 

For Carmen’s moving address to the court after his sentencing see below {subheadings added].

Child of the Vietnam War

In my opening declaration to the court, I remarked that I’m a child of the Vietnam war, and my primary reason to go to college was to discover who was telling the truth about the war in Vietnam and the reasons for which we fought it. I’m only like 18 years old. It was in college that I first heard Rev. King’s “Beyond Vietnam” speech, and in a way, that was the saddest day of my life.

It also redirected my life.

The proof was simple enough. As King explained it, by 1954 the United States was paying for 80 percent of the French effort to recolonize Vietnam. Then and there, I learned that the U.S. has no more noble reason to be there than the colonizers we sought to replace. Then did I begin a journey that has led me to my presence before the court today.

Extensive Criminal Record”

I was told by the prosecution that I have an extensive criminal record, and when I heard this, I was dumbstruck. I didn’t think I had any criminal record, but I did at some point come to understand that I had 20/30 arrests, but in my mind they were all justified. Every one of my actions has been a reaction to an American war crime.

Moreover, in every instance, my arrests were for acts of nonviolent civil disobedience or civil resistance. Let me say, unambiguously, that in all of my extensive criminal history, I have never raised a hand in anger and violence against another. In court, I had mentioned my concern that the “institutional memory of the court is perverse.”

The court knows where and when I was arrested, what the charges were and what I was sentenced to. But nothing of the context within which I was arrested: and context is everything. We may remember in our own trial, Mark Colville was confronted with the notion that what he had done was like running a red light – a straight forward violation of the law. But there are times when, in a particular context, anyone in their right mind would run a red light, as for instance the several times I rushed my ailing father to the hospital, saving his life.

Nonviolent Responses to Concerns of Conscience

So as regards war crimes, I’ve run a lot of red lights. To be clear, this criminal has never assaulted anyone, never stolen anything, has never threatened anyone. If convicted of disorderly conduct, it was not for being drunk and urinating in the street. It was for holding a banner in front of the White House and refusing to move… unfortunately the court would not know what the banner said.

Notably, the longest sentence I’ve ever been given, prior to my fifty days for the action at hand, was twelve days. So in short, all of my arrests were deliberate, nonviolent responses to the concerns of my conscience, which I hold to be a divine gift. It is not merely a divine gift to me. It is to everyone. It is what makes a human.

Nicaragua – Reagan and his “Contras” Terrorist Militia 1986

My first incarceration was in 1986 in Des Moines, Iowa. A number of Catholic Workers had joined a larger coalition petitioning then Gov.Branstad to reject a federal request for the state’s National Guard unit to go down to Honduras “to build roads.” In actual fact, they would be building invasion corridors into Nicaragua for the so called Contras, a terrorist militia adopted, funded, trained and advised by the Reagan administration, to overthrow the first democratically elected government in Nicaragua in more than 40 years. Prior to the Sandinista revolution Nicaragua was a US client state, under the despotic control of the Somoza family.

We should all be aware of the fact that the US has almost no history of supporting democracy abroad.

Prior to our action, six states, under public pressure, had refused federal requests to state National Guard units. We were hoping to make Iowa the seventh. We went to the Capitol to meet with the Governor, and he failed to show up. Some 25 of us decided to remain in the office until he appeared. When the building closed for the night the coalition members decided we would wait overnight. Subsequently, state police entered the office to escort us out. I went limp, and was incarcerated overnight.

Days after the action, congressional legislation was passed making it impossible to deny a federal request for a National Guard unit, unless the Governor declared a state of emergency, the so-called Montgomery Amendment.

Iran Contra Scandal Exposed- Oliver North

So, my first arrest was in resistance to an act of American terrorism which came to be know as the Iran Contra scandal. The most active agent of the scandal was Lt. Col. Oliver North, a decorated Vietnam veteran who moved into a secret office within the National Security Council. Behind the back of congress and in violation of the Boland Amendment of 1985, North solicited money from private donors and various nations and turned a blind eye to money garnered from shipments of crack cocaine, brought into the the United States via drug cartels with ties to the Contras.

Eventually the scandal was exposed. Over a dozen government officials were convicted of crimes. Oliver North was given a 3 year suspended sentence for being a kingpin in an act of American terrorism which kicked off a ten year war which took the lives of 30,000 people. All of those convicted were pardoned by the next administration. Having never raised a hand in violence, it seems odd to me that I’m destined to serve more prison time than Oliver North.

US War With Iraq and Sanctions

Another war, indeed a series of wars that I responded to, were related to Iraq. For 30 years now we have been bombing Iraq.

Despite the brutal, dictatorial rule of Saddam Hussein, the people of Iraq managed to create a decent infrastructure. Before US intervention and occupation, Iraq had top of the line hospitals; child mortality rates were comparable to European nations; the populace was supplied with clean safe water; illiteracy was basically eradicated.

But in 1991 American bombs systematically obliterated that infrastructure. This was compounded by the most deadly regime of economic sanctions in history. Prior to the war Iraq 70% of the country’s food came from imports. The sanctions forbade UN member states from selling any foodstuffs to Iraq, with the exception of “humanitarian circumstances.” More the bombing destroyed nearly every water treatment plant in the country. Chlorine, an essential agent in water treatment facilities was deliberately sanctioned. This was done with the full knowledge that water borne diseases would result. Cholera and typhoid, previously almost non-existent, spiked dramatically in the next few years.

Madeline Albright’s Comment about 500,000 Children Dead

These were unconscionable policies! Deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure, and men women and children.

More than 200,000 Iraqis perished by the end of the first Gulf war. The Clinton administration then took the reins, and persistently, if sporadically, continued bombing. In 1996, the UN issued a report that 500,000 children below the age of 5 had died due to the harsh sanctions imposed. Then Sec. of State Magdalene Albright was questioned on this by Leslie Stahl on 60 Minutes: “We have heard that a half million children have died…I mean…that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?”

Albright responded:”I think this is a very hard choice, but the price – we think the price is worth it.”

Albright never apologized for that statement.

Protection of Dissent

So, this is my great dilemma: the conflict between my love of country and my conscience and, what seems to be, the increasing numbness of the nation's conscience.

It still strikes me to hear the words “all men are created equal,” and the words “certain God-given and inalienable rights.” Rather obviously we have not lived up to these ideals. But somehow, it is still music in my ear. It is this very conflict that has led me to my actions and to this moment standing before you. I’ve read some of your stuff Judge Wood, and I know that you have some regard for the protection of dissent. Let us pray for the strength and resilience of one another’s conscience. And I hope you develop a relish for dissent.



Sunday, 25 October 2020

Colm Roddy and Dave Donnellan Not Guilty


Court Report: Colm Roddy Case Dismissed


After four years five months and eighteen days, the trials of peace activists Colm Roddy and Dave Donnellan have ended with a Not Guilty verdict by a jury in the Circuit Criminal Court in Dublin. They had been charged with criminal damage to a fence and runway without lawful excuse, at Shannon airport on 5 May 2016.  Both Dave and Colm pleaded not guilty.  On Friday last, eleven men and one woman took less than two hours to give their verdict.

The Long Wait

They have been in various courts some 36 days since the day of their action. The years, months and days have been punctuated with some bizarre episodes both inside and outside of court. They had been banned from the whole of Co Clare at a court in Gort, Co Galway.. They were both re-arrested on 18 November 2018 near the court room in Ennis to bring "new charges" against them, based in part on an absurd change in the amount of damage from €300 to €3500 (for cutting a hole in the fence and painting some red crosses on the runway).  Then, on that same day, the case against Colm was dismissed. This decision was reversed by the same judge on another day. And almost 4 years later a jury in Dublin. in effect. has dismissed the State's action against both Colm and Dave.  The net result apart from the dogged and unnecessary persecution of two very honourable citizens is enormous cost to the State, faces redder than the crosses that were painted on the runway, personal lives disrupted - and the message of the two peace activists loudly proclaimed again and again, not least in their final addresses to the jury on Friday last.

The Long Walk

Time after time, the Irish State had refused to search suspicious planes at Shannon, planes that activists from local groups such as Shannonwatch knew were carrying troops and arms to foreign wars. During the Iraq war debacle even rendition planes had, disgracefully, passed through Shannon; but when Taoiseach Bertie Ahern was challenged on the issue he told the Dáil "I looked at the great President Bush and I said to him, 'you know, I want to be sure to be sure' and he assured me". Even today,  US planes are still carrying troops through Shannon airport to war. In the early morning of 5 May 2016, Dave and Colm did their long courageous walk (45mins) along the runway to a US Army Lear C-21 jet and requested its Irish minders, both military and police, to do a search of the aircraft.

Reasons for the Action

They gave their reasons to the jury in their final addresses. Dave said that he believed his prosecution for allegedly cutting the fence shows “we have lost perspective on what's really important.  I believe what's really important is life itself.  The life we share with our loved ones and the life we share with people we don’t know; people in Iraq and Libya and Syria and all the other places affected by US-led wars. Their lives are as important as our own. That's what took me into Shannon airport four years ago."

Colm said that the US military has been using Shannon as an effective forward operating base for over 17 years and he has been protesting about this since then.  Around 2.5 million US troops have transited through the airport on their way to wars; and taxpayers’ money is being used to pay overtime for army and garda officials to guard US military planes at the airport. Many of these US soldiers have come back in bits and in boxes and are as much victims as the people who die in the wars in countries in north Africa and the Middle East.  “As a citizen of Ireland I'm made complicit in this destruction and torture. My actions show that I will not meekly allow the State to make me complicit in the murder. This is both a rational and reasonable position to hold.” he said. He believed his actions had lawful excuse by raising awareness of these issues.

Both Colm and Dave told the jury that their actions on the day were a protest against the use of Shannon airport by US military. They assert that the presence of US military planes and troops is a breach of Irish neutrality and has, according to international law, turned the airport into a legitimate target for enemy combatants of the US. 

The State's Witnesses

Earlier in the trial the State had produced several witnesses including Mark Reidy, maintenance manager at the airport who in reply to Colm said that the costs (€3500) were estimated because the programme of works was ongoing and that “that section of the fence has not been repaired yet”. He said a suggestion that “you've spent no money on repairing the fence” was correct.

Pat O'Brien of Airport Police in reply to Dave said that he had seen the Law of War manual of the US Department of Defence produced earlier in the week. He did not agree that the security at Shannon Airport was “laughable” (in the light of that document)

Corporal Thomas Dillon told the jury that he and other officers were on duty that night and were stationed beside a US plane. He told Mr McGillicuddy (prosecuting) that “we stay on the ground until the plane takes off” and remain for some time after take off in case the plane needs to return to the airport.

He said that when he first saw two men approaching the plane at around 6am “I thought my eyes were playing tricks” and he picked up binoculars to view the men. One was carrying a flag and banner the other a wooden cross. He said he warned both men to stop and that he and his colleagues had their weapons behind their backs at all times.

In reply to Colm's suggestion that “the purpose of the Irish armed forces at Shannon is to ensure that peace activists like myself and Mr Donnellan don’t get near the American planes you are guarding, to search or to damage [them]”, he replied that Colm needed to put this question to somebody in government

Judge and Jury

At the end of the trial, Judge Karen O'Connor, instructing the jury, said:  “You must decide whether they (Dave and Colm) believed their actions to be justified. It does not matter if the belief is justified or not, as long as Mr Roddy and Mr Donnellan honestly hold the belief,”

When they returned the Not Guilty verdict, Judge O'Connor thanked them for diligently carrying out their duties especially in the midst of a pandemic and she graciously thanked the defendants (who are lay litigants) and their legal advisors, (Mc Kenzie Friends Seán Ryan and Raymond Walker) for their courtesy and dignity throughout the trial.

Statements from Dave and Colm

After the event, Dave Donnellan said: “Our actions were faith based. As Irish citizens we felt compelled as a matter of conscience to highlight Irish Government complicity in war crimes and it is a matter of deep regret to us that this complicity is still ongoing almost daily since 2001".

An equally modest and sobering comment came from Colm Roddy: “The result of this trial gives us no cause for celebration. Our peaceful non-violent actions in May 2016 were undertaken to highlight Irish complicity and participation in US wars in the Middle East that have caused the deaths of millions of people in the Middle East, including the deaths of up to one million children since the First Gulf War in 1991"

The decision of the jury rested eventually on whether or not they had lawful excuse under Irish law to carry out their action.  They had. 

Another interesting aspect of the case was the fact that the prosecution were not allowed to make a closing address to the jury because of a legal rule which applies when the defendant is a lay litigant and does not call any witnesses.

Sources: Declan Brennan (for Limerick Leader and Irish Times), Indymedia Ireland, Shannonwatch, Partners in Faith (including picture), Edward Horgan (email), The World News, court observers and others.

LINKS: limerickleader  

shannonwatch irish times theworldnews partners in faith